What are we working on?
Read-only access to synthetic vehicle, catalog, local-availability, order, and store-fulfillment resources. No AutoZone system or record is connected.
Read-only access to simulated capability, dependency, service-health, and portfolio metadata. No AutoZone production systems, customer data, inventory, orders, or employee records are represented.
Read-only access to simulated candidate metadata, synthetic evaluation summaries, and illustrative cost scenarios. No AutoZone prompts, models, systems, customer data, vehicle data, inventory, or orders are exposed.
Illustrative policy trace
| Step | Enforced policy | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Request resource | Starts with no access; request is limited to Synthetic Fitment + Fulfillment | Approved read-only |
| Run deterministic query | Typed capability; credential remains isolated | Logged |
| Render app | Observed resources stay attached to the output | Bound |
| Share | Viewer permissions are checked at open time | Human controlled |
Read-only access to synthetic vehicle, catalog, local-availability, order, and store-fulfillment resources. No AutoZone system or record is connected.
Resource boundaries
AutoZone - Connected Store & Digital Fulfillment Brief
Purpose
Define a testable journey from vehicle and job context through parts fitment, local availability, store or digital handoff, and fulfillment while keeping promises and exceptions human-owned.
Jobs to be done
| Priority | Journey moment | Required review |
|---|---|---|
| Fitment context | Identify vehicle and compatible parts | Product + safety review |
| Availability view | Compare synthetic nearby options | Data + operations review |
| Fulfillment handoff | Choose and complete fulfillment | Service + privacy review |
Operating principles
- Start with a measurable job to be done, not a new tool.
- Use curated company context before model knowledge.
- The human owner remains accountable for every output.
- An agent never receives more permission than the person using it.
Delivery sequence
Days 1-30: Map public customer promises and define hypothetical capability, ownership, and data boundaries.
Days 31-60: Prototype one read-only path using synthetic fitment, availability, and fulfillment records.
Days 61-90: Evaluate synthetic scenario quality, freshness, handoffs, customer effort, and control behavior.
Control alignment
Consumer privacy, payment security, vehicle-data minimization, product safety, accessibility, inventory freshness, least privilege, and human approval are mandatory review inputs.
Workspace sources
Draft an illustrative target state connecting vehicle context, fitment, local availability, digital purchasing, and store fulfillment.
Read-only access to simulated capability, dependency, service-health, and portfolio metadata. No AutoZone production systems, customer data, inventory, orders, or employee records are represented.
Resource boundaries
Workspace sources
Compare illustrative fitment, availability, and fulfillment-assistance candidates under quality, safety, access, cost, and human-oversight gates.
Read-only access to simulated candidate metadata, synthetic evaluation summaries, and illustrative cost scenarios. No AutoZone prompts, models, systems, customer data, vehicle data, inventory, or orders are exposed.
Resource boundaries
Integrations
Organization-wide connections for AutoZone OS. Gatekeepers hold credentials, scope resources, and log each action.
Illustrative remote services available to authorized workspaces.
Organization Context
Shared, curated knowledge that grounds every AutoZone OS workspace. Context is versioned and read-only to agents.
Skills
Reusable workflows for every function. The human requester owns the result.
| Name | Description | Group | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| meeting-prep | Build an agenda and briefing from authorized calendar, CRM, and document context | General | Shared library |
| weekly-operating-review | Create a cross-functional summary with decisions, owners, and open risks | General | Shared library |
| incident-response | Assemble evidence, draft updates, and preserve human approval for containment | Security | Shared library |
| vendor-risk-review | Compare due-diligence evidence with security and privacy standards | Security | Shared library |
| control-evidence-pack | Map authorized evidence to control requirements and identify gaps | Security | Shared library |
| architecture-review | Review a proposal against architecture principles and decision criteria | IT & Architecture | Shared library |
| change-impact | Map dependencies, affected services, stakeholders, and rollback requirements | IT & Architecture | Shared library |
| service-health-review | Summarize service levels, incidents, changes, and capacity risks | Operations | Shared library |
| runbook-builder | Turn a procedure into a deterministic workflow with approval gates | Operations | Shared library |
| ai-model-review | Summarize ownership, evaluations, drift, risk tier, and release readiness | Data & AI | Shared library |
| data-quality-report | Assess freshness, completeness, lineage, and policy compliance | Data & AI | Shared library |
| budget-variance | Compare actuals with plan and draft a finance-reviewed variance narrative | Finance | Shared library |
| procurement-brief | Summarize requirements, alternatives, risk, and approval status | Finance | Shared library |
| job-description | Draft an accessible role description from approved job architecture | HR | Shared library |
| onboarding-plan | Create a role-based onboarding plan without expanding system permissions | HR | Shared library |
| contract-intake | Extract terms, route issues, and prepare a legal review checklist | Legal | Shared library |
| privacy-assessment | Map a proposed workflow to data categories and privacy obligations | Legal | Shared library |
| account-brief | Create a customer briefing from authorized CRM and public information | Sales | Shared library |
| proposal-draft | Build a first draft using approved claims, pricing, and brand context | Sales | Shared library |
| executive-update | Turn project evidence into a concise decision-oriented update | General | Shared library |
Profile
Illustrative account information for this public prototype.
AI Gateway
Illustrative demo data. Visibility and controls across every AI provider AutoZone uses — one console.
Models in Use
This month| Model | Route | Tokens | Spend | Share | p50 latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | Workers AI | 156M | $2,140 | 310 ms | |
| Claude | via AI Gateway | 98M | $3,980 | 720 ms | |
| GPT-4o | via AI Gateway | 61M | $2,510 | 640 ms | |
| Workers AI embeddings (bge) | Workers AI | 27M | $190 | 40 ms |
Spend vs. Budget
9 days remainingUsage by Workspace / Team
342M tokens totalGovernance
Guardrails enforced by Gatekeepers + AI Gateway, with resource-scoped access, audit trails, and human approval.
Per-team allowed models
Restrict which providers each workspace can call.
Monthly spend caps
Hard limits per team; agents stop before overrun.
PII redaction
Strip sensitive fields from prompts before they leave.
Prompt / response logging
Full request logs retained for audit & review.
Rate limits
Per-team request ceilings to protect budgets.
Raise Data & AI cap to $6,000
Change queued by an agent — needs a human sign-off.
Requires approval